(July 9, 2022) This is all we can say with certainty about the events surrounding Jesus' death:
This quote from Jesus about destroying the temple is authentic having a validity number of 1.93:
Jesus would have objected to the Jewish temple because it was contrary to his magic path teachings about improving one's inner self and surrounding social fabric. Sacrificing innocent animals to pay for violations of often arbitrary religious rules and thinking that made a person right with God was self-delusional. What is worse is that the temple officials were making lots of money off fooling people in this way. Consequently, he seems to have said something about the temple eventually being destroyed. This was reported in Mark 13 below and given an apocalyptic twist:
The destruction of the temple in 70 CE by the Romans after a 5 month siege was seen as a fulfillment of Jesus' quote and it gave a boost to the apocalyptic wing of the Jesus movement. The temple's destruction seems to have been what motivated the author of Mark to write his gospel.
News spread about Jesus' anti-temple statements and action against the money changers. This started to cause some social conflict and was likely a significant factor in his arrest by the Romans and in his betrayal by one of his own disciples (Judas).
The payment amount to Judas of 30 pieces of silver is symbolic and comes from the “broken covenant” passage in the Old Testament book of Zechariah 11:8-12. In this passage the shepherd (as a reference to God) is claimed by the prophet Zechariah to have broken his covenant with Israel because of Israel's disobedience. Zechariah is then paid 30 pieces of silver to keep quiet and go away but instead he throws that money at the potter of the temple to indicate that God rejected their attempt to silence him.
Mark (70 CE)
Luke-Acts (80 CE)
John (90 CE)
Thomas (90 CE)
(July 9, 2022) Two separate lines of evidence support Jesus’ crucifixion in Jerusalem:
Paul says the following about the crucifixion in his letter to the Galatians in the context of stating that belief in Jesus as the messiah is superior to following Jewish law:
Acts says the following in the context of trying to convince the non-Christian Jews that Jesus was the messiah:
The best date for the death of Jesus seems to be 32 CE. Arriving at this date begins with the observation that all four gospel sources and Josephus agree that Jesus was crucified during the rule of Pontius Pilate which occurred between 26 to 36 CE.
According to Luke 3:21 Jesus began his ministry shortly after he was baptized by John the Baptist and John the Baptist began his activity during the 15th year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar.
All the rulers mentioned in this passage are confirmed to have overlapping reigns by other historical records suggesting Luke is a reliable source in this instance (see the entries in the Anchor Bible Dictionary):
Tiberius Caesar was ruler of the Roman Empire after Augustus and he ruled from September of 14 CE to 37 CE so the 15th year of his reign would be 28 or 29 CE (depending whether the partial year is counted as year 1 or not counted at all). Most likely Jesus was baptized by John sometime during John’s first or second year making the start of his ministry near 30 or 31 CE. If one goes by the synoptic gospels Jesus preached between 1 and 2 years giving a date range for his crucifixion between 31 and 33 CE. So the year 32 CE seems a reasonable date for the crucifixion,
Whiston, W. (1987) The Works of Josephus. Hendrickson Publishers
(July 9, 2022) After Jesus died his body was put in a nearby tomb. The evidence for that is the Gospel of Mark dated to 70 CE. One Joseph of Arimathea of the Jewish religious council (Sanhedrin) was offended by the idea of a dead body hanging on the cross over the Passover Holiday. He knew of an empty family tomb nearby and sought to use it as a temporary storage place for the body. The story begins with this passage in Mark:
The next stage of the story has the women coming back after the Passover Sabbath to properly prepare the body for burial only to find that the body was missing. The Gospel of Mark shows that the followers of Jesus did not initially know what to make of the empty tomb which is different from what is presented in the later gospels of Matthew and Luke which wanted to give a more apocalyptic spin to everything.
As we shall see, an empty tomb or at least the claim that the tomb was empty is necessary to explain the rise of apocalyptic Christianity. It was the belief that Jesus had first risen in bodily form from the dead which gave people the power of the Spirit at Pentecost two months later. This convinced many that the apocalyptic end times were at hand because the dead rising was a sign.
Yet an easy non-miraculous explanation also exists for this. No head of an extended family would allow the body of a stranger to remain in the family tomb any longer than necessary. So as soon as Passover was over Joseph of Arimathea would have had some workmen remove the body and bury it in a pauper’s grave site. Thus the tomb was empty when the women came back to properly prepare Jesus’ body for permanent entombment. The women do not really seem surprised because they tell no one until later.
By the time Mark was written Christianity could not accept the women’s confusion surrounding the empty tomb. By then the apocalyptic oral tradition was already claiming that Jesus’ disciples already knew that Jesus was the messiah and that he had risen in bodily form although he could come back anytime in a spiritual body form because he had ascended to heaven after a brief stay on earth as a dead body. Therefore, this lack of recognition had to be explained away.
The gospel of Mark does this at the end his tale by stating that the women were afraid so they did not tell anyone. The later gospels dispense with this fear explanation and replaced it with an encounter with the risen Jesus. In Matthew the women see him first but this female priority was not acceptable to the author of Luke so that source had some male disciples see Jesus first on the road to Emmaus. Still, all the gospels agree that the disciples did not see a risen Jesus in Jerusalem when the empty tomb was discovered. The rest of the story appears in Mark below:
(July 9, 2022) From the earliest times, the burial practices of the Israelites have centered on burials in family plots. This has been confirmed both by archeology and by Biblical references. The judges Gideon, Samson, and Asahel are reported to have been buried in their father’s tomb on family land (Judges 8:32, 16:31, 2 Samuel 2:32).
If a deceased had no family nearby he or she would have been buried and their burial place marked so that their family could later come and retrieve their bones. The bones seemed to represent the essence of the dead person. Moses took the bones of Joseph out of Egypt so he could be buried in Israel (Exodus 13:19). The bones of others who died in the Exodus are reported to have been carried and buried at Shechem (Joshua 24:32). King David retrieved the bones of the former king Saul and his son Jonathan from the Gibeonites and placed them in Saul’s family tomb at Kish (2 Samuel 21:13-14).
The prophet Elisha’s bones reportedly brought a stranger’s body to life after the body was hastily thrown into Elisha’s tomb by a burial party in a hurry to escape some bandits (2 Kings 13:21). Yet bones could also defile an altar as happened when some were burned at the altar at Bethel by the Yahwist zealot king Josiah when he wanted to get rid of competitors to the Jerusalem temple (2 Kings 23:16-20). Ezekiel 37:4-14 has the prophecy about how God will form physical bodies out of bones at the end times. Finally we should not forget that the most powerful relics in medieval Christianity were the bones of saints, especially the bones of the apostles Peter and Paul which Rome claimed.
The practice of placing bones into stone box-like ossuaries within the tombs began in Jerusalem around 30 to 20 BCE, perhaps as a way to keep using the family tomb for new bodies (Hachlili 1992). Around Jerusalem these family tombs were cut into the cliff faces surrounding the city.